East Timor lastly seems set to hitch the Affiliation of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) this 12 months. The nation’s accession to the bloc has been a very long time coming. Greater than a decade in the past once I first moved to Dili, the Timorese capital, authorities officers and odd individuals commonly touted the alternatives ASEAN membership presents.
The financial motivation for East Timor’s bid to hitch ASEAN is as clear now because it was then, however within the present context, its membership may also convey a powerful ethical and democratic voice to the bloc.
As a rustic that rightly prides itself on a document of respect for human rights and democracy at dwelling and help for actions aimed in the direction of justice and self-determination overseas, East Timor will strike a distinct tone than lots of ASEAN’s different members.
Fairly than dimming its mild to adapt to ASEAN’s drained patterns of impunity concerning human rights abuses, East Timor can personal its identification as a vibrant liberal democracy and use its platform throughout the bloc to affect its positioning. Nowhere is that this extra obligatory than in ASEAN’s Myanmar coverage, which has been paralysed by a impasse for years.
In 2021 within the aftermath of the Myanmar military’s coup in opposition to the democratically elected authorities, ASEAN adopted the 5 Level Consensus. This plan, which requires the “quick cessation of violence” and a dedication from fighters to train “utmost restraint,” has been rendered ineffective attributable to constant violations by the Myanmar junta and ASEAN’s indecisiveness within the face of such violations.
The next diplomatic impasse has left Myanmar’s pro-democracy motion, which now numbers within the thousands and thousands, with scant worldwide backing because it fights for freedom from a brutal navy regime. That is the place East Timor’s historical past of overcoming oppression might play an instructive position.
Like Myanmar immediately, East Timor spent a long time beneath violent navy rule, which subjected the Timorese individuals to massacres, compelled displacement and systemic violence. Solely via the principled stance of the Timorese individuals and sustained worldwide solidarity might they lastly safe their independence in 2002.
This historical past of resilience and dedication provides East Timor a deep understanding of the significance of world help within the combat for justice. The individuals of Myanmar are additionally demanding their proper to self-determination, and East Timor should now stand and act in solidarity with them. One space the place the Timorese authorities can present initiative is the involvement of the Worldwide Felony Court docket (ICC).
The Nationwide Unity Authorities (NUG) of Myanmar, which was shaped by elected lawmakers eliminated within the 2021 coup and represents the individuals, has conferred jurisdiction on the ICC and has requested the courtroom to analyze and prosecute crimes in Myanmar since 2002. Nonetheless, the courtroom has not acted on the NUG’s request, seemingly attributable to consternation over the NUG’s capability to symbolize Myanmar on the world stage.
In a state of affairs equivalent to this, it’s incumbent on member states of the ICC to refer the state of affairs to the chief prosecutor by making use of Article 14 of the Rome Statute, which permits them to request an investigation in a specific matter. As considered one of solely two ASEAN members of the ICC, East Timor is in a singular place to make such a referral.
This is able to be a traditionally vital transfer and will additionally predicate a sea change in ASEAN’s method to the Myanmar disaster, guaranteeing that accountability stays firmly in place in future peace negotiations. A referral to the ICC would additionally broaden the scope of the courtroom’s current jurisdiction in Myanmar and would focus worldwide consideration on the junta’s postcoup atrocities in addition to its genocide of the Rohingya.
Critics could query whether or not a small island nation equivalent to East Timor might have an effect on a disaster as complicated and seemingly intractable as Myanmar’s. This overlooks, nevertheless, the facility of small states to have an outsized affect on worldwide affairs, particularly in domains that require ethical readability somewhat than massive energy positioning.
Now we have seen this on the United Nations with Liechtenstein’s efforts to carry the everlasting members of the UN Safety Council to account over their veto powers, Eire’s principled stance on Gaza and, within the Myanmar context, The Gambia’s main position in searching for worldwide justice for the Rohingya.
In a time when the key powers appear more and more inward-looking and isolationist, area is opening up for smaller states to indicate the remainder of the world what it means to steer by instance.
Moreover, East Timor’s leaders in referring Myanmar to the ICC would echo the worldwide help it obtained throughout its personal battle for independence – thus permitting the nation to “pay it ahead”. Within the Nineteen Nineties, world advocacy and UN intervention performed essential roles in ending Indonesia’s occupation of East Timor. Now, East Timor can supply the identical type of solidarity and help to Myanmar, urging the worldwide group to take stronger motion in opposition to its navy regime.
East Timor’s accession to ASEAN may very well be greater than only a diplomatic formality. It may very well be a second of transformative management – one by which a small nation with a historical past of profound battle makes use of its newfound place to push for significant change. By invoking the authorized mechanisms of the ICC, East Timor couldn’t solely assist maintain Myanmar’s junta accountable but in addition encourage ASEAN to take a stronger stand in help of democracy and human rights throughout the area.
With East Timor taking the initiative, ASEAN might grow to be a regional power for justice – a power that not turns a blind eye to the struggling inside its boundaries.
The views expressed on this article are the writer’s personal and don’t essentially mirror Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.